Search for: "United States v. Price"
Results 401 - 420
of 5,223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2015, 11:36 pm
Halo contends that those products were sold and offered for sale within the United States because negotiations and contracting activities occurred within the United States, which resulted in binding contracts that set specific terms for price and quantity. [read post]
Refusal to Sell Bulk-Size Packs, Without More, Is Not Price Discrimination – “Size is Not a Service”
26 Aug 2016, 8:52 am
Citing United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 12:25 pm
United States (Trust Relationship; Arizona-Florida Land Exchange Act)Adams v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:14 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 1:16 pm
On Tuesday morning, the Court will hear argument in Gross v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 11:58 am
In Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2005, 5:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 3:14 pm
In the back and forth battle between companies and former employees regarding the confidential nature of customer information, the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska has just issued a decision of note in Softchoice Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:02 am
We have started posting the hordes of memos in our “Securities Litigation” Practice Area, but here’s analysis from Skadden: The Supreme Court of the United States today in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
The contract, which the parties made in 1989, had a total price of more than $40 million. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 1:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
"[18] Significantly, anti-trust laws do not necessarily guarantee low prices, only the conditions that lead to them.[19] This distinction is intentional; the United States Supreme Court has recognized that while it may set the circumstances for achieving a fair price, the workings of a liberal market are better able to determine the fair price itself.[20] While anti-trust laws prohibit fixing maximum prices, the entire… [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 11:19 am
Alternatively, the developer could comply with the IHO by paying an in-lieu fee not to exceed the difference between the price of a market rate and affordable housing unit or dedicating land. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 8:58 am
Check the United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 5:41 am
Cuomo, 66 NY2d 185, 190-191 [1985], citing United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 5:00 pm
United States. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm
Turkish Airlines ~ ComplaintSholopa v. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm
Turkish Airlines ~ ComplaintSholopa v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 8:54 pm
This hardly seemed fair, so the United States Supreme Court in the classic case of Illinois Brick v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 2:49 pm
” FTC v. [read post]