Search for: "United States v. Price" Results 61 - 80 of 5,782
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[23] This violated Supreme Court precedent because “utilizing a back-end price drop as a proxy for [a] front end misrepresentation’s price impact works only if, at the front end, the misrepresentation is propping up the price. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For instance, while the United States and Singapore determine the COMI based on the date of the application for recognition is filed, the United Kingdom and Australia use the date of the filing of the foreign proceedings and the date of the hearing of the recognition application, respectively, as the relevant dates to determine the debtor’s COMI. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm by ernst
This book traces the development of the jurisdiction from the foundational decisions of Huckle v Money and Wilkes v Wood in England, to leading modern cases such as Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd in Australia, Whiten v Pilot Insurance Co in Canada, Couch v AG (No 2) in New Zealand, PH Hydraulics and Engineering Pte Ltd v Airtrust (Hong Kong) Ltd in Singapore and Mathias v Accor Economy Lodging, Inc and State Farm Mutual… [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
At minimum, the implementation of all provisional measures should be a condition before the United States, or any country, considers further military or diplomatic support of Israel. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:33 am by centerforartlaw
The criminal gang responsible for this theft sold the Buddha heads to a dealer from Chengdu at $1500, and they then sold them to a buyer from Southeast China for $18,500.[16] It often happens that the stolen work doubles or triples in price each time it is transferred to a new buyer. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 5:31 am by Ashley Morgan
When the FDA approves a drug for sale in the United States, the FDA includes a section in the drugs package insert titled "Indications for Use. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 10:59 am by Keith Szeliga
Welcome back to the Cost Corner, where we provide practical insight into the complex cost and pricing requirements that apply to Government contractors. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 12:16 pm
See https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-deutsche-telekom-ag. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 12:16 pm
See https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-deutsche-telekom-ag. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
 Section 2: Any purchase, sale, or other exchange involving goods or services in the United States must be conducted in U.S. dollars. [read post]