Search for: "United States v. Price"
Results 141 - 160
of 5,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2010, 4:09 am
United States District Judge Janet C. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 10:03 am
In 2007, the United States Supreme Court, updating the application of the cumulative advances in antitrust economics as applied to vertical restraint cases, overruled the venerable Dr. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 3:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 11:24 am
United States [SCOTUSblog materials] in favor of a veteran-owned business in a challenge against the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) [official website]. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 8:21 am
In 2006, Congress passed a bill that states the VA "shall" award contracts to veteran-owned small businesses if at least two such businesses bid on the work at a fair price. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 11:01 am
United States, No. 21-1702; and M6-VETS, LLC v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 2:20 pm
Supreme Court’s 1962 decision in Baker v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 9:59 pm
By Andrew Williams -- United States District Judge Seeborg of the Northern District of California denied Amgen's motion for a preliminary injunction today in the Amgen v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 11:17 am
We often lament “the vanishing trial” in the United States. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:29 am
The CAFC case Takeda v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 6:58 am
On December 10th, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its ruling in Rutledge v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 2:01 pm
Earlier this month, the United States Supreme Court heard argument in the case of Beach Renourishment v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 3:44 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:11-cv-02075). [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 9:23 am
These questions underlay a case heard in the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 1:38 pm
See United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 5:23 pm
The Ninth Circuit had to determine whether Centerprise's claim, that higher prices in the United States caused its foreign injury because defendants could not have raised prices worldwide without fixing prices in the United States, satisfied the domestic injury exception. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 9:16 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 8:07 am
United States, No. 22-CV-1466 (Fed. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 5:51 am
It invests in real estate markets of United States. [read post]
