Search for: "United States v. Procter & Gamble Co" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2012, 9:18 am by PaulKostro
Procter & Gamble Co., 356 U.S. 677, 682 (1958), the Court stated that “[m]odern instruments of discovery serve a useful purpose…. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
"They have a very large product line," he says.However, in view of the product lines which have been implicated, the problem of false marking is a bit more complicated:Defendants include companies such as Procter & Gamble, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Cisco Systems, Scientific-Atlanta, Merck & Co., Pfizer Inc., 3M Co., DirecTV, Medtronic Inc. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 2:46 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Procter & Gamble Distributing Co., 973 F.2d 911, 914 (Fed. [read post]
14 May 2019, 11:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Procter &Gamble Co. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 3:11 pm by Mark Giangrande
Quaker State-Slick 50, Inc., 165 F. 3d 221, 233–234 (CA3 1998); Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Indeed, precisely that scenario is how we ended up with Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
On May 26, 2015, the Solicitor General’s office responded to the United States Supreme Court’s Oct. 14, 2014 invitation for the government’s views on the certioraripetition filed in Athena Cosmetics, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  As of the time of trial, the state of the art did not include a genetic marker for SJS/TEN. [read post]
8 May 2012, 10:29 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
A onetime head of McKinsey & Co, he is accused of giving Rajaratnam secrets of Goldman and Procter & Gamble board meetings in 2007 and 2008. [read post]