Search for: "United States v. Procter & Gamble Co" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
In any event, under the federal RICO statute (as opposed to the analogous state RICO statutes) showing perjury in a state court proceeding will not be enough to state a valid claim. [read post]
14 May 2019, 11:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Procter &Gamble Co. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
O’Malley (Judge, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, USA) explained that currently, there were three avenues to challenge patents in the United States – through the District Courts up to the CAFC, through the International Trade Commission, and through the USPTO Patent and Trademark Appeal Boards (PTAB) to the CAFC. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
On May 26, 2015, the Solicitor General’s office responded to the United States Supreme Court’s Oct. 14, 2014 invitation for the government’s views on the certioraripetition filed in Athena Cosmetics, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  As of the time of trial, the state of the art did not include a genetic marker for SJS/TEN. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 10:00 am by Ron Coleman
& Pat.App. 1961) and first applied, albeit not by name, in Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 3:11 pm by Mark Giangrande
Quaker State-Slick 50, Inc., 165 F. 3d 221, 233–234 (CA3 1998); Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Indeed, precisely that scenario is how we ended up with Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]