Search for: "United States v. Procter & Gamble Co." Results 21 - 40 of 65
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Indeed, precisely that scenario is how we ended up with Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
On May 26, 2015, the Solicitor General’s office responded to the United States Supreme Court’s Oct. 14, 2014 invitation for the government’s views on the certioraripetition filed in Athena Cosmetics, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
In any event, under the federal RICO statute (as opposed to the analogous state RICO statutes) showing perjury in a state court proceeding will not be enough to state a valid claim. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist)   Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC Supreme Court:… [read post]
8 May 2012, 10:29 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
A onetime head of McKinsey & Co, he is accused of giving Rajaratnam secrets of Goldman and Procter & Gamble board meetings in 2007 and 2008. [read post]
8 May 2012, 10:29 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
A onetime head of McKinsey & Co, he is accused of giving Rajaratnam secrets of Goldman and Procter & Gamble board meetings in 2007 and 2008. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  As of the time of trial, the state of the art did not include a genetic marker for SJS/TEN. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:34 pm by Ron Coleman
& Pat.App. 1961) and first applied, albeit not by name, in Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 10:00 am by Ron Coleman
& Pat.App. 1961) and first applied, albeit not by name, in Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 2:29 pm by Alden Abbott
Procter & Gamble (1967) that “[p]ossible economies cannot be used as a defense to illegality. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am by Marie Louise
Power Beverages (TTABlog) Test your TTAB judge-ability on this specimen of use for financial advisory services: In re R & B Receivables Management (TTABlog)   US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Estwing – Denying statements for which defendant lacks information or belief is “oxymoronic”: Estwing Manufacturing v CTT Tools (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) Procter & Gamble – NYT again discusses trademark bullying as… [read post]