Search for: "United States v. Procter & Gamble Company" Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2009, 4:58 am
After a final judgment upholding the validity of the Procter & Gamble Company U.S. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:54 pm by Schachtman
Procter & Gamble Distrib., LLC, 766 F.3d 1296 (11th Cir. 2014). [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Postmaster Gen. of United States (6th Cir. 2019) ("Harm to reputation is insufficient to overcome the strong presumption in favor of public access…"); Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(b) Any person may sue for the penalty, in which event one-half shall go to the person suing and the other to the use of the United States. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 9:09 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
The Procter & Gamble Commercial Company, 228 F.3d 24 (1st Cir. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:30 am by Ben
In August 2016, she placed the photograph—which has a pending copyright registration in the United States—on her Instagram page, accompanied by a copyright notice. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist)   Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC Supreme Court:… [read post]
8 May 2012, 10:29 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
A onetime head of McKinsey & Co, he is accused of giving Rajaratnam secrets of Goldman and Procter & Gamble board meetings in 2007 and 2008. [read post]
8 May 2012, 10:29 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
A onetime head of McKinsey & Co, he is accused of giving Rajaratnam secrets of Goldman and Procter & Gamble board meetings in 2007 and 2008. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 1:07 pm by Alden Abbott
Background: The Grudging Acceptance of Merger Efficiencies Not long ago, economically literate antitrust teachers in the United States enjoyed poking fun at such benighted 1960s Supreme Court decisions as Procter & Gamble (following in the wake of Brown Shoe andPhiladelphia National Bank). [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
On May 26, 2015, the Solicitor General’s office responded to the United States Supreme Court’s Oct. 14, 2014 invitation for the government’s views on the certioraripetition filed in Athena Cosmetics, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
FTC Chair Lina Khan previewed this in June, stating that “The word ‘efficiency’ doesn’t appear anywhere in the antitrust statutes. [read post]