Search for: "United States v. Quincy"
Results 1 - 20
of 103
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
He left the bulk of his estate to the United States.[2] He never explained what he expected the United States to do with the money, which was then the largest unrestricted gift ever made to the federal government.[3] “Taxes are the price we pay for civilized society,” he’d once written in a famous dissent.[4] Was the bequest a kind of tax he felt he owed the country? [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 11:51 pm
United States, so it is hard to be wildly enthusiastic about any of them. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:21 am
So this was different from the troop of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, looting during the 16th century. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
United States and the tax in Moore v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 8:01 am
United States, as well as a second case, Brown v. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 2:40 pm
See Knick v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 11:44 pm
Democracy (such as it is) in the United States seems to have temporarily survived a violent attack on its legislature. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
No one thought these states were no longer in the United States. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 2:50 pm
That small group includes George Washington’s chief of staff, a future United States president, and a controversial New York state politician. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Drawing from comparative analysis and federal theory, we argue that elements of federal solidarity are readily identifiable in the United States and that conceiving of them as such helps to clarify doctrine, for example, around the dormant commerce clause and interstate sovereign immunity. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:16 am
Similarly, in Merit Construction Alliance v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
The Executive Order endorsed this approach, noting that “this order reaffirms that the United States retains the authority to challenge transactions whose previous consummation was in violation of the [antitrust laws]. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:30 am
Hayes (1976) and John Quincy Adams (1824). [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 11:06 am
In the 1950 case of Brown Shoe Co., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm
" Dissent: Whatever the Fifth said, there's two meanings of "necessary," and this ain't the one from McCulloch v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 8:09 am
FTC v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 8:26 am
” In Scranton Quincy Clinic Company, LLC v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 11:00 am
FTC v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
For example, I’ve long taught the fascinating case of Elkison v. [read post]
