Search for: "United States v. Quinn"
Results 201 - 220
of 456
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2013, 11:42 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has already issued one ruling in Apple's favor against Google's Motorola (reversing and remanding an ITC ruling, which Google just asked it to reconsider), was clearly leaning Apple's way last month with respect to its continued pursuit of a permanent injunction against Samsung, and based on how today's appellate hearing on Judge Richard Posner's June 2012 dismissal of a two-way Apple v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:54 pm
In State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:03 pm
Quinn. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:50 am
Supreme Court decided several cases related to arbitration: On April 27, 2011, in a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the the Federal Arbitration Act preempted California law with regard to class arbitration in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 1:03 pm
The bad news is that one -- United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:33 am
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 2003 U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 3:44 pm
" United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:13 pm
Certiorari stage documents: Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Title: Quinn v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:36 pm
Commentary on the four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:03 pm
See, e.g., Quinn v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 12:26 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has just given notice of a scheduling decision. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 5:32 am
” For the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh reports that one of those cases, United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
Self-described as the “largest [law firm] in the United States devoted solely to business litigation,” the firm recently made headlines as being counsel for Samsung in the much-watched Samsung v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:45 am
Self-described as the “largest [law firm] in the United States devoted solely to business litigation,” the firm recently made headlines as being counsel for Samsung in the much-watched Samsung v. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 11:16 pm
Corp v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:36 pm
All concede that the cap Eckhardt wore represented a symbol responding to tasteless commentary about women uttered by a United States President. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am
United StatesDocket: 11-955Issue(s): Whether the McCormick v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
[a] regulatory body ... of ... the United States"—in this case, the FDA. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
Uber’s own drivers have brought a class action in a case called Yucesoy v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:30 pm
Unite Here Local 355 and Unite Here Local 355 v. [read post]
