Search for: "United States v. Quinn"
Results 201 - 220
of 393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
[a] regulatory body ... of ... the United States"—in this case, the FDA. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 2:43 pm
Late on Wednesday by local (California) time, United States Magistrate Judge Paul S. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 1:00 pm
United States Abramski v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
Briefly: In The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses last week’s grant in the two cell phone privacy cases, United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
California and United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 9:17 am
The case of Harris v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 4:37 am
In two of the new cases, United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 9:06 pm
In the case of Harris v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am
Scheiner and Jennifer Quinn Broda1]of the Sedgwick law firm take a look at what looks like will be the next scandal to beset the financial industry – that is, the alleged improprieties involving the foreign exchange market. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 8:25 am
United States and the treaty power. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 1:16 am
If any of the parties declines to proceed before a Magistrate Judge, the case will have to be assigned to a United States District Judge. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
Quinn, in which the Court will consider whether a group of home health care workers funded by Medicaid are state employees and therefore required to pay their “fair share” of the costs of union representation, continues with a guest post from Ann Hodges, who argues that the case “has the potential to knock out one of the pillars under the carefully balanced labor law system in the United States. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 5:23 am
The practice is far from universally accepted, despite the momentum that the civil rights has garnered over the past 24-months, especially in the wake of the SCOTUS's seminal United States v Windsor decision. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:28 am
QE's approach of not teaming up with patent attorneys in these types of proceedings is as unusual as it is controversial in the German IP law community, but in the proceedings I watch there is no indication of them being less effective on their own.All three parties (Apple, Google, Microsoft) also dispatched in-house counsel from the United States, which speaks to the significance of this case.The U.S. equivalent of this patent is still at issue in a Motorola v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 10:01 am
United States. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 10:01 am
United States. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:13 am
Colorado (2000) 12-1371 — United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Capital punishment in the United States is often considered in terms of its constitutional vulnerability. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 3:16 am
In the United States the parties want a final FRAND ruling (they disagree only on details), which Google will then appeal. [read post]
