Search for: "United States v. Quinn" Results 241 - 260 of 458
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2013, 1:41 am by Florian Mueller
Today's rulings were the first two decisions in any of the patent infringement actions Nokia started in May 2012 in the United States and Germany (and which also involves more than a dozen UK cases by now). [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:36 am by James Coppess
Quinn, his criticism became much more strident. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:29 pm
“What is the security risk to the United States should these people be admitted to live here? [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 5:41 am by Florian Mueller
"In mid-2013, the United States Patent and Trademark Office had upheld three claims of that patent, including one Apple asserted against Samsung in the 2012 trial (and the related 2013 retrial).Apple still hasn't given up on its European rubberbanding patent. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 6:42 am
John Dudas and the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Plaintiff Tafas also alleged that the PTO's promulgation of the Final Rules will cause him harm. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 7:41 am by Benjamin S. Persons, IV
Laurent was a citizen of the United States and a resident of Georgia on the date of the accident. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:33 pm by Josh Blackman
House Resolution 676 was framed very broadly: The lawsuit could “seek any appropriate relief regarding the failure” of all executive-branch officials — including the president himself — “to act in a manner consistent with that official’s duties under the Constitution and laws of the United States with respect to implementation” of the ACA. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 6:36 am by The Kaplan Law Firm
Quinns 1776, LLC and it was litigated in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:50 am by John Elwood
United States, 12-8505, for that upstart non-relist Paroline v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:46 am by Lyle Denniston
  Justice Elena Kagan is not participating in this case. * United States v. [read post]