Search for: "United States v. Quinn"
Results 301 - 320
of 455
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2017, 11:34 am
In Harris v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 6:19 am
He is not alone in his outlook—in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision last June, in Harris v Quinn, such agreements have stood on shaky ground. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 11:51 am
Friedrichs v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:48 pm
Indeed, some courts have explicitly recognized that the Equal Protection Clause protects public employees from sexual orientation-based discrimination (see, for example, Quinn v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 7:00 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:29 am
GE Healthcare, Ltd., et. al (Docket Report) District Court N D Texas: Judge Solis compares false marking to ‘someone who says, ‘I am not married,’ when indeed, they are’: United States of America, ex rel. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 2:02 am
On December 28, Chief Judge Rodnay Gilstrap of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas granted Ericsson an unprecedented--and in my view, outrageously overreaching--temporary restraining order (TRO) against Samsung's pursuit of a Chinese action intended to resolve a global FRAND rate dispute. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:00 pm
In the courts: H and L v A City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 403 (14 April 2011) : Local authority’s disclosure of sex offender’s conviction to charities he worked with was unlawful as he didn’t work with children Inzunza & Ors v United States of America & Ors (Rev 1) [2011] EWHC 920 (Admin) (14 April 2011): Extradition of 3 criminal suspects (2 of murder, 1 drug dealing) would not be inhuman & degrading punishment contrary to Article 3… [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 2:43 am
Actually, it pales by comparison.By coincidence, Marvell's lead counsel, Quinn Emanuel's Kevin Johnson, was also on Samsung's team in the Apple trial. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 3:40 pm
United States, a challenge to Congress’ authority to criminalize cockfighting in Puerto Rico. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 8:04 am
Quinn, that a majority of the Court would welcome a plea to undo the first precedent extending “agency shop” rules to the public sector — Abood v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's reply Title: Quinn v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:42 am
The Court below had agreed with the State that agency fees were justified under the Court’s earlier precedents, particularly Abood v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 6:14 am
As the United States Supreme Court has noted, "People in an open society do not demand infallibility from their institutions, but it is difficult for them to accept what they are prohibited from observing. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am
(2) Does Section 514 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act violate the First Amendment of the United States Constitution? [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 9:26 am
Quinn Emanuel is also Samsung's counsel in the ongoing California trial (where it just achieved a significant improvement for its client ahead of jury deliberations).Motorola filed a companion lawsuit (over the same seven patents) against Apple with the United States District Court for the District of Delaware.These are the seven patents-in-suit in the ITC action (and the companion federal lawsuit) along with the descriptions Google (Motorola) and infringement… [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:33 am
As a result, the Apple v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 11:26 pm
Orrick of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California decided that Samsung's allegation of Huawei having breached its FRAND licensing obligations will be put before a San Francisco Jury in September, which is precisely what the Chinese plaintiff sought to avoid by means of a motion to strike its Korean rival's jury demand. [read post]
U.S. appeals court unlikely to grant Apple an injunction against Samsung over three software patents
4 Mar 2015, 8:00 pm
He expressed great admiration for Apple's contribution to innovation in a 2013 ruling in an Apple v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Instead, it doubled down yesterday in a way that I struggled to believe when I saw it this morning: for a patent infringement case in San Diego (Southern District of California) in which Qualcomm stands very little to gain after the judge determined that any damage claims would be limited to a period starting in the spring of 2017, the United States' #1 female lawyer, former Stanford Law School dean and Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan name partner Kathleen M. [read post]
