Search for: "United States v. Quinn" Results 21 - 40 of 466
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2011, 10:31 am by Stefanie Levine
This morning the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Stanford v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 9:55 am by Andrew Hamm
On February 16, the National Constitution Center will host a discussion on United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm by admin
By Jim Cline In a decision on a case that had presented significant financial and operational important to Public Employee Unions, the United States Supreme Court held this Monday in Harris v Quinn that the Illinois law, as applied to a special class of home health care workers, unconstitutionally imposed a “fair share” dues payment  […]The post In Closely Watched Decision, Supreme Court declines to Hold Mandatory Union Dues Clauses… [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:24 am by Andrew Hamm
On February 16, the National Constitution Center will host a discussion on United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:15 am by Eileen McDermott
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on Tuesday announced that it has updated its interim guidance on the Director Review process under Arthrex v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm by Steven G. Pearl
Quinn, ___ U.S. ___ (6/30/2014), the United States Supreme Court considered "whether the First Amendment permits a State to compel personal care providers to subsidize speech on matters of public concern by a union that they do not wish to join or support. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm by M.J. Asensio and Sam Endicott
Quinn, 573 U.S. __ (2014), the Supreme Court of the United States in a five to four ruling struck down an Illinois regulatory framework that required personal assistants (PAs) for Medicaid recipients to pay agency fees to the union. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 3:23 pm by David Lat
Kaplan, Roberta Kaplan, SCOTUS, Stop and Frisk, Supreme Court, United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 6:29 am
Quinn is firmly convinced that “the new patent rules will substantially change patent law and practice and negatively affect all companies and individuals who use the U.S. patent system. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:15 am by Eileen McDermott
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on Tuesday announced that it has updated its interim guidance on the Director Review process under Arthrex v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 6:00 am by Gene Quinn
On Thursday, October 20, 2016, from 2pm to 3pm ET, Gene Quinn will host a free webinar discussion that will explore the genesis of the patent battle between Apple and Samsung, focusing on the design patent infringement fight currently at the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:34 am by Stefanie Levine
Gene Quinn, of IPWatchdog and Practice Center Contributor, sent in this article discussing why he believes the United States Supreme Court's decision to accept cert. in Kappos v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:34 am by Stefanie Levine
Gene Quinn, of IPWatchdog and Practice Center Contributor, sent in this article discussing why he believes the United States Supreme Court's decision to accept cert. in Kappos v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:22 pm by WIMS
Oct 3: National Mining Association (NMA) President and CEO Hal Quinn announced that the association was filing a petition in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for reconsideration and stay and petition for review of U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 10:15 am by Daniel Hanson
In that same vein, following is a discussion of a (less recent) decision from the United States Supreme Court, Elgin v. [read post]