Search for: "United States v. Quinn"
Results 101 - 120
of 455
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2018, 5:59 am
Jeffrey Quinn). [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 7:06 am
Quinn, the majority agreed that there was a state interest in having a single mandatory bargaining representative. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:19 am
The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees is the exclusive representative empowered to negotiate with Illinois about wages, hours and conditions of employment for Janus’ bargaining unit. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 11:17 am
Janus v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 11:34 am
In Harris v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:52 am
Quinn ruling. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 11:09 pm
Yesterday (Sunday), Judge Lucy Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California determined that a new Apple v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 6:30 am
Quinn. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 7:54 am
United States and Ortiz v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 3:27 pm
In West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am
Quinn, 287 S.W.3d 158, 177 (Tex. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
JESSICA PARKER VALENTINE AND BRYAN L. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
§ 4102.051(a) (providing that "[a] person may not act as a public insurance adjuster in this state or hold himself or herself out to be a public insurance adjuster in this state unless the person holds a license issued by the commissioner"). [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
§ 4102.051(a) (providing that "[a] person may not act as a public insurance adjuster in this state or hold himself or herself out to be a public insurance adjuster in this state unless the person holds a license issued by the commissioner"). [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 2:21 pm
O’Quinn (4th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (finding that correctional officers who acted outside of the scope of their official duties in “hazing” a coworker still acted under color of state law); United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The summary stated that the Supreme Court allows Eli Lilly's appeal and holds that Actavis' products directly infringe Eli Lilly's patent in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:38 am
Qualcomm's motion mentions complaints by Apple in the same district (Southern District of California) and "in the United Kingdom, China, Japan, and Taiwan. [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:28 am
Quinn, the U.S. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:34 am
Is there any way that Bayer v. [read post]
