Search for: "United States v. Quinn"
Results 101 - 120
of 392
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2017, 7:19 am
The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees is the exclusive representative empowered to negotiate with Illinois about wages, hours and conditions of employment for Janus’ bargaining unit. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 11:17 am
Janus v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 11:34 am
In Harris v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 11:09 pm
Yesterday (Sunday), Judge Lucy Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California determined that a new Apple v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 7:54 am
United States and Ortiz v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 3:27 pm
In West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am
Quinn, 287 S.W.3d 158, 177 (Tex. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
JESSICA PARKER VALENTINE AND BRYAN L. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
§ 4102.051(a) (providing that "[a] person may not act as a public insurance adjuster in this state or hold himself or herself out to be a public insurance adjuster in this state unless the person holds a license issued by the commissioner"). [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The summary stated that the Supreme Court allows Eli Lilly's appeal and holds that Actavis' products directly infringe Eli Lilly's patent in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:38 am
Qualcomm's motion mentions complaints by Apple in the same district (Southern District of California) and "in the United Kingdom, China, Japan, and Taiwan. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:34 am
Is there any way that Bayer v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm
Kornreich, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Ret); Of Counsel, Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer and Nelson, P.A. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 10:35 am
It has taken the Supreme Court of the United States less than two months since a mid-October hearing and less than ten pages (counting only the opinion per se, not the two-page syllabus) to determine and explain that the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit got the law on design patent damages fundamentally wrong. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 9:15 am
Stay motion Judge Spath moves on to the defense’s “motion to abate pending the resolution of the United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 12:54 pm
Supreme Court ruling Hurst v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
If you have been following the machinations by the Obama Justice Department [sic] over amending the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees, you may have found yourself wondering who was responsible for rejecting the good faith efforts of the songwriting community in favor of a cynical back room deal with multinational tech companies and broadcasters. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:36 pm
Commentary on the four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:58 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
