Search for: "United States v. Quinn" Results 101 - 120 of 467
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 11:09 pm by Florian Mueller
Yesterday (Sunday), Judge Lucy Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California determined that a new Apple v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 4102.051(a) (providing that "[a] person may not act as a public insurance adjuster in this state or hold himself or herself out to be a public insurance adjuster in this state unless the person holds a license issued by the commissioner"). [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 4102.051(a) (providing that "[a] person may not act as a public insurance adjuster in this state or hold himself or herself out to be a public insurance adjuster in this state unless the person holds a license issued by the commissioner"). [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 2:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
O’Quinn (4th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (finding that correctional officers who acted outside of the scope of their official duties in “hazing” a coworker still acted under color of state law); United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The summary stated that the Supreme Court allows Eli Lilly's appeal and holds that Actavis' products directly infringe Eli Lilly's patent in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:38 am by Florian Mueller
Qualcomm's motion mentions complaints by Apple in the same district (Southern District of California) and "in the United Kingdom, China, Japan, and Taiwan. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Kornreich, United States Bankruptcy Judge (Ret); Of Counsel, Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer and Nelson, P.A. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 10:35 am by Florian Mueller
It has taken the Supreme Court of the United States less than two months since a mid-October hearing and less than ten pages (counting only the opinion per se, not the two-page syllabus) to determine and explain that the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit got the law on design patent damages fundamentally wrong. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 9:15 am by Alex Loomis, Quinta Jurecic
Stay motion Judge Spath moves on to the defense’s “motion to abate pending the resolution of the United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 6:00 am by Gene Quinn
On Thursday, October 20, 2016, from 2pm to 3pm ET, Gene Quinn will host a free webinar discussion that will explore the genesis of the patent battle between Apple and Samsung, focusing on the design patent infringement fight currently at the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:33 pm by Josh Blackman
House Resolution 676 was framed very broadly: The lawsuit could “seek any appropriate relief regarding the failure” of all executive-branch officials — including the president himself — “to act in a manner consistent with that official’s duties under the Constitution and laws of the United States with respect to implementation” of the ACA. [read post]