Search for: "United States v. Quinn"
Results 121 - 140
of 469
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2016, 6:00 am
On Thursday, October 20, 2016, from 2pm to 3pm ET, Gene Quinn will host a free webinar discussion that will explore the genesis of the patent battle between Apple and Samsung, focusing on the design patent infringement fight currently at the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:33 pm
House Resolution 676 was framed very broadly: The lawsuit could “seek any appropriate relief regarding the failure” of all executive-branch officials — including the president himself — “to act in a manner consistent with that official’s duties under the Constitution and laws of the United States with respect to implementation” of the ACA. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 12:54 pm
Supreme Court ruling Hurst v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
If you have been following the machinations by the Obama Justice Department [sic] over amending the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees, you may have found yourself wondering who was responsible for rejecting the good faith efforts of the songwriting community in favor of a cynical back room deal with multinational tech companies and broadcasters. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:36 pm
Commentary on the four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:58 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:03 pm
Martinez before the fictitious Thirteenth Circuit, in an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Tennessee. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 7:25 am
Case 2: InCom Corp. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:51 am
Quinn). [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:33 am
As a result, the Apple v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 11:22 am
In Harris v Quinn 573 U.S. ___ (2014) the court held that the First Amendment prohibits a State from forcing non-union members to pay for union speech on matters of public concern. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 1:52 pm
The coalescence of circumstance resulted in the birth of a legal challenge that would take years and ultimately be determined by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm
Quinn Heraty reports on the trademark battle to make us forget SPAM v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 9:55 am
On February 16, the National Constitution Center will host a discussion on United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:24 am
On February 16, the National Constitution Center will host a discussion on United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 12:00 pm
Quinn. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:10 am
Several of my co-conspirators have commented on the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in the immigration case United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 3:11 am
United States “retroactive have focused on the three circuits where prisoners are being denied permission to file successive petitions,” that focus “is a mistake. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:31 pm
Quinn. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 7:42 am
The due process clauses of the Texas and United States Constitutions require that parties to an arbitration proceeding are entitled to a hearing. [read post]
