Search for: "United States v. Quirk"
Results 1 - 20
of 123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2010, 7:39 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 1:44 pm
United States, 293 F. 1013, 1014 (D.C. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 10:21 am
However a United States Supreme Court opinion forbids state courts from treating military disability as anything other than income to the disabled veteran. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:09 pm
But that would be wrong: state election laws have been struck down in light of Citizens United. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 11:08 am
" Pruidze v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 9:12 pm
“Minimal [statistical] impact,” as Judge Weinstein points out in United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 9:14 am
(Zabin v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:56 am
Warren DSS v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 7:43 pm
Initially, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey granted summary judgment in favor of Aleynikov on the advancement issue, but on appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed and vacated the trial court’s ruling. [read post]
20 May 2015, 5:37 pm
This case was a challenge to the constitutionality of Hawaii's campaign finance laws following the Supreme Court's decision in Citizen's United v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 11:33 pm
Supreme Court explained in United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 3:10 am
This article investigates the quirks of the Lanham Act’s Section 2(a), which provides a right-of-publicity-style ground of refusal of registration to celebrities, universities with nicknames, and international companies seeking protection of their well-known marks in the United States (where those companies are not using such marks)—and without a showing of trademark rights, use in commerce, or likelihood of confusion. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 2:16 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:53 pm
Ohio's age discrimination statute of limitations has always been one of the quirks of Ohio employment law. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 10:41 pm
Simpson's criminal trial) and Opening Arguments: A Young Lawyer's First Case: United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:14 pm
It is heartening to see the likes of the ACLU and Americans United for Separation of Church and State and Planned Parenthood taking a stand against extreme religious liberty. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:29 pm
But the decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:52 am
United States, No. 17-5554. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:25 pm
In United States v. [read post]
