Search for: "United States v. Railroad Company" Results 1 - 20 of 452
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Tad Lipsky
Similar analyses soon included other large technology companies. [read post]
It manages railroad track across the eastern United States, including thousands of miles of track in Pennsylvania. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am by Ralf Michaels
This is not unproblematic: the European Union undertakes here the same unilateralism that it used to criticize when previously done by the United States, with the Helms/Burton Act as the most prominent example. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 4:50 pm by Russell Knight
United States, 293 F. 1013(D.C.Cir.1923)…The Frye standard….dictates that scientific evidence is only admissible at trial if the methodology or scientific principle upon which the opinion is based is sufficiently established to have gained general acceptance in the particular field in which it belongs. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:00 am by ernst
Erie Railroad Company v Tompkins in a Private International Law ContextMichael S Green4. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  The Doyle decision, for example, involved a Michigan law that empowered a commission to forbid the sale of securities if it thought that a company’s business plan was not “fair. [read post]
17 May 2023, 5:26 am by John Coyle
Supreme Court’s decision in Erie Railroad Company v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
On the other side, the funds are investing in a wide array of companies. [read post]
North Coast Railroad Authority (2017) 3 Cal.5th 677, which held that the federal Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act (“ICCTA”) does not preempt CEQA for a new railroad project, and that the State of California, as the railroad operator, could opt to subject itself to CEQA review without conflicting with the ICCTA. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 10:20 am by
Kitty Block is President and CEO of the Humane Society of the United States. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Unknown
The court had previously interpreted nearly identical language in the Federal Railroad Safety Act as requiring evidence of retaliatory intent, another reason to interpret SOX consistently with that holding.In his petition for certiorari, the whistleblower points to the burdens of proof incorporated by reference in the SOX provision (“An action brought under paragraph (1)(B) shall be governed by the legal burdens of proof set forth in section 42121(b) of title 49, United… [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
May, President of the Free State Foundation In West Virginia v. [read post]