Search for: "United States v. Railroad Company"
Results 221 - 240
of 419
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2014, 7:46 am
Elaine Goldenberg, representing the United States, which filed an amicus brief in support of neither party, also disagreed with the state’s position on comparison class. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Wong and United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 9:07 pm
In Department of Transportation v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:00 pm
The doctrine is derived from Article I of the Constitution, which says that, “All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States. . . . [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 4:04 am
The case was Steele v. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am
The common law, as it developed in the United States from the early 19th century, was hospitable to apportionments that avoided “entire” or “joint and several” liability. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:33 am
Pietras On September 2, 2014, the Department of Justice announced a settlement in United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:33 am
On September 2, 2014, the Department of Justice announced a settlement in United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:34 am
United States, ___ U.S. ___, 134 S. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:51 am
Abbott Town of Atherton v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In comparing the two readings what differences in approaches can one discern between that of equity as practiced outside the United States (in Australia) and in the United States.2. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 11:41 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 12:31 am
The United States’ court system has a clear hierarchy, and lower courts are obliged to follow the decisions of the Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am
Wong, 13-1074, and United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:20 am
United States, the Court held that a provision of the federal bank fraud statute which makes it a crime to “knowingly execut[e] a scheme . . . to obtain” property owned by, or under the custody of, a bank “by means of false or fraudulent pretenses” does not require the government to prove that a defendant intended to defraud a financial institution. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:55 am
United States in an 8 to 1 decision. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 10:36 am
United States, 636 F. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:19 pm
Comparing (consistent with a stipulation by the railroad and the state) the taxation of the railroad with those of its direct competitors, the court of appeals agreed with the railroad that the tax was discriminatory because the railroad’s competitors do not pay it. [read post]
