Search for: "United States v. Railroad Company" Results 241 - 260 of 460
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2014, 7:46 am by Darien Shanske
Elaine Goldenberg, representing the United States, which filed an amicus brief in support of neither party, also disagreed with the state’s position on comparison class. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
Wong and United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:00 pm by Stephen Wermiel
The doctrine is derived from Article I of the Constitution, which says that, “All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States. . . . [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am by Schachtman
The common law, as it developed in the United States from the early 19th century, was hospitable to apportionments that avoided “entire” or “joint and several” liability. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:33 am by Katherine McCoy
Pietras On September 2, 2014, the Department of Justice announced a settlement in United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:33 am by Liskow & Lewis
On September 2, 2014, the Department of Justice announced a settlement in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
  In comparing the two readings what differences in approaches can one discern between that of equity as practiced outside the United States (in Australia) and in the United States.2. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:09 am by Joy Waltemath
Denying a company’s petition to review a final agency decision that the company violated safety regulations in failing to evaluate respiratory hazards involved in cleaning rail cars that carried hazardous chemicals and failing to train employees on the chemicals, a Fifth Circuit panel rejected the company’s claims that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) was preempted from regulating the operations, that the OSHA report approving the… [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 12:31 am by Alexandra Hamilton
The United States’ court system has a clear hierarchy, and lower courts are obliged to follow the decisions of the Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 2:53 pm by Amanda Traphagan
The United States Supreme Court has already announced that it will review three state tax cases in its upcoming term — Comptroller v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am by John Elwood
Wong, 13-1074, and United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:20 am by Amy Howe
United States, the Court held that a provision of the federal bank fraud statute which makes it a crime to “knowingly execut[e] a scheme . . . to obtain” property owned by, or under the custody of, a bank “by means of false or fraudulent pretenses” does not require the government to prove that a defendant intended to defraud a financial institution. [read post]