Search for: "United States v. Rajaratnam" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2011, 1:52 am by admin
NEW YORK—The May 11 guilty verdict in the insider-trading trial of former Galleon Management LLC principal Raj Rajaratnam may embolden federal prosecutors to use increasingly aggressive tactics during insider trading cases, former prosecutors told BNA May 11 (United States v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 8:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  Indeed, the interviews of Goldman Sachs employees were conducted jointly by the United States Attorney's Office, the FBI, and the SEC. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 9:40 am by admin
District Court for the Southern District of New York to 11 years in prison—the lengthiest term ever imposed on an individual for insider trading violations (United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 5:00 am by Jeremy Liles
Finally, Gupta's legal difficulties are not limited to the SEC case: the United States has indicted Gupta for conspiracy to commit securities fraud. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:18 am by admin
District Court for the Southern District of New York on conspiracy and securities fraud charges (United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 5:17 am by Nicholas J. Wagoner
The ATS provides that “district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States. [read post]
8 May 2012, 10:29 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Rajaratnam is serving an 11-year prison term, the longest sentence handed down for insider trading in the United States, after being convicted in the same court a year ago. [read post]
8 May 2012, 10:29 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Rajaratnam is serving an 11-year prison term, the longest sentence handed down for insider trading in the United States, after being convicted in the same court a year ago. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 1:10 pm by Alain Leibman
United States, 390 U.S. 39, 53 (1968) (privilege available when invoker “is confronted by substantial and ‘real’ . . . hazards of incriminating); Hoffman v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 6:45 am by David G. Badertscher
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice Transmitting Conviction Supported Even If Firm Not 'Domestic Financial Institution' United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 5:17 am by David Oscar Markus
  This time it's a confrontation clause issue in United States v. [read post]