Search for: "United States v. Ramirez"
Results 181 - 200
of 226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm
" United Nuclear Corp v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 1:28 am
Ramirez v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 8:38 am
United States, 19-7320, a sequel to Stokeling v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 12:47 pm
United States, 20-6387, involving prohibitions on delay in prosecution of criminal cases; three-time relist Allen v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am
United States, in which legendary boxer Muhammad Ali appealed the rejection of his application for conscientious objector status at the height of the Vietnam War”; Justice Sonia Sotomayor presided, and “Justice Clarence Thomas, who sometimes seems bored on the bench, watched raptly from a spectator’s seat. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:19 am
Cooley and Nobles v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
In Ramirez v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:02 am
The document emanates from the United States Patent and Trademark Office and is titled "Notice of Request for Comments on the Feasibility of Placing Economically Significant Patents Under a Secrecy Order and the Need to Review Criteria Used in Determining Secrecy Orders Related to National Security". [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:19 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 4:03 pm
Its attorneys—hired by TSI on a state-by-state basis--never do that. [read post]
11 May 2010, 5:39 pm
FTC Commissioner Edith Ramirez will open the afternoon session. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 11:48 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 11:48 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:47 am
Segovia v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:15 pm
The topic was the Texas v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:15 pm
The topic was the Texas v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 1:16 pm
United States Dept. of Transp., 879 F. 3d 339, 344 (CADC 2018). [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 3:33 pm
Ramirez, a majority of the minority population in the United States is stripped of their right to vote. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 8:40 pm
No, not section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Rather, section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment, which allows Congress to intervene in state elections in a way that is more extreme and intrusive than its requirement that states preclear every change to their election laws. Section 2 gives Congress the ability to reduce a state’s representation in the House when it abridges the right to vote at “any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice… [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:26 am
And that is precisely what the Supreme Court held in Richardson v. [read post]
