Search for: "United States v. Ramirez" Results 141 - 160 of 214
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-5684, Gates v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 4:43 am by Richard Hunt
Collins having filed a lawsuit in federal court anywhere in the United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:44 am by Michael F. Smith
That outcome largely tracks the position the United States advanced as amicus curiae, and does not constitute a sweeping revision of the standards for qualified immunity, or application of the exclusionary rule, when officers execute a warrant that lacks probable cause. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 1:32 am by Mike
Judge William Alsup stated the United States Supreme Court 'has not yet made a clear ruling that admission of irrelevant or overtly prejudicial evidence constitutes a due process violation sufficient to warrant issuance of the writ.' [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
  Cars are simply too far afield, so even for a United States Supreme Court decision, we won’t dilute the drug/device nature of our list that much.1. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
United States without reaching the central question presented by the cert petition, which involved clarifying the rule of Marks v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Supp. 151, 156-57 (S.D.N.Y. 1988).Deference to the FDA was the express basis of the decision in Ramirez v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 9:43 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The Court rejects the argument advanced by the United States, as amicus, that this amounted to “informational injury” that was sufficient to confer standing. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 8:06 am by Jill Family
Statutory Background Under the INA, lawful permanent residents of the United States are not citizens of the United States, but they hold “green cards” and enjoy the right to live and work in the United States with little restraint compared to other lawful immigration categories.  [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Ramirez, Justice William Rehnquist said that Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment – which was arguably intended to protect the voting rights of freed slaves by sanctioning states that disenfranchised them – exempts disenfranchisement based on a felony conviction. [read post]