Search for: "United States v. Ramsey" Results 1 - 20 of 162
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2022, 9:10 am by Ilya Somin
  For example, a clear statement is needed before a statute is read to interfere with a state's internal governance (Gregory v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Introduction:   Robert Burrell Australia/NZ is probably unusual b/c abandonment plays 3 distinct roles: (1) not a purely rhetorical device. 1863 case: from the moment you first use a TM, you have a property right—no goodwill, no reputation required. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 11:43 am by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
  This test was first articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Illinois v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am by Eric Goldman
’” The examining attorney at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) refused to register the proposed mark on the ground the phrase falsely suggests a connection with a person (here Donald Trump) in violation of Lanham Act Section 2(a), and also because this mark violates Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:12 pm by James Romoser
United States that Sheehan had a First Amendment right to continue publishing the classified material. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 5:01 am by Michael Ramsey
Senator Wade pointed this out and suggested guaranteeing rights to all persons born in the United States. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 5:01 am by Michael Ramsey
Senator Wade pointed this out and suggested guaranteeing rights to all persons born in the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Yen says consumers learned; Dinwoodie says the same: “consumers in the United States have clearly become accustomed to private label practices in supermarkets. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The trial in the case of Turley v Unite the Union concluded before Nicklin J on 19 November 2019. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 2:43 pm by Ilya Somin
United States, involves deciding how much policymaking delegation by Congress is too much (it being undoubtedly true that some policymaking delegation is inevitable). [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
What does Brexit mean for data protection: part 2 The Panopticon Blog has a post about the case of Campbell v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland [2018] UKUT 372 (AAC) – Death and the DPA. [read post]