Search for: "United States v. Ramsey" Results 61 - 80 of 174
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2017, 7:52 am by J. Gordon Hylton
When not coaching the Cavaliers, Heikkinen divided his time between his legal studies and his involvement with the University of Virginia’s Flight Preparatory School which was established as part of the United States Navy’s V-12 program during the Second World War. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
“Denial“, a film based on Deborah Lipstadt’s book of the 2000 libel trial, Irving v Penguin Books and Lipstadt (see Gray J’s judgment, [2000] EWHC 115 (QB))  has been released in the United States. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  [I think this is a matter of leveraging reciprocity norms; Ramsey mentions guilt.] [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 1:47 am by Tom Pritchard
Justice Ramsey ruled against the Council stating that the word “default” meant default in relation to the provisions of the 1984 Act and not the 1957 or 1974 Acts. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:08 am
 As the opinion explains, [a]ccording to the Complaint, Defendant drove his automobile from Mexico to the United States Port of Entry in Calexico, California. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 10:54 am by Andrew Hamm
Justice James Iredell died at the age of forty-eight from the toll of riding the Southern Circuit four times in five years, including trips to New York City, which was then the capital of the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
State limits choices of individuals to protect them from consequences of their own decisions. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 1:58 pm by Michael Ramsey
The statute in which the disputed provision appears is titled “United States Policy with Respect to Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by My name
[xiii] An excellent discussion of the legislative history and Congressional intent of this statute is discussed in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:19 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Wednesday’s argument in Yates v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 4:39 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court will consider whether a commercial fisherman violated the anti-shredding provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act when he destroyed several undersized fish. [read post]