Search for: "United States v. Reading Co." Results 141 - 160 of 5,968
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Robinson, Co-Editor-in-Chief, Workers’ Compensation Emerging Issues Analysis (LexisNexis) As we move through the third decade of the twenty-first century, the United States remains a land of contradictions. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 3:18 am
"While it does not lie within the jurisdiction of the Board to enforce a contract between parties, Vaughn Russell Candy Co. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am by Eric Goldman
He initially suspected that Snapchat would be exempt until he read a news report quoting one of Act 689’s co-sponsors who claimed Snapchat was specifically targeted for regulation. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 11:46 am by LII Team
Unsurprisingly, the highest-profile cases yielded the most pageviews, with tens of thousands of people reading our students’ explanations of 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am by Ben Sperry
Another co-panelist—Shoshana Weissmann of the R Street Institute—also has a terrific series of blog posts on this particular issue. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:17 am by Eugene Volokh
I'm a mother of four children and I live in the United States without any family for the last seventeen years. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 4:08 pm by Mary Love and Devin Ricci
The United States Copyright Office (“USCO”) denied the application because the work “lack[ed] the human authorship necessary to support a copyright claim. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
Alexandria Women's Health Clinic (1993) (interpreting § 1985(3)'s first clause); United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am., Loc. 610, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
ANALYZING THE LEGAL STANDARD Who counts as an officer of the United States? [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 5:33 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Code of Civil Procedure section 2094 states as follows: (a) An oath, affirmation, or declaration in an action or a proceeding, may be administered by obtaining an affirmative response to one of the following questions: (1) “Do you solemnly state that the evidence you shall give in this issue (or matter) shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God? [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:40 am by M. Jeanette Pitts
Because the new statute does not include the procedural protections present in the federal pretrial detention statute upheld in United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
The reason the Court had occasion to consider whether the Second Bank of the United States was validly chartered by the United States was because if it was (as the Court held it was), then it was an instrumentality of the United States and therefore immune to taxation by a state. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
But at least Justice Holmes acknowledged that "[o]f course an employee of the United States does not secure a general immunity from state law while acting in the course of his employment. [read post]