Search for: "United States v. Real Estate Boards"
Results 161 - 180
of 502
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2021, 6:17 am
Moss, United States Senate, then at the Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 6:17 am
Moss, United States Senate, then at the Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 6:17 am
Moss, United States Senate, then at the Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 9:59 am
But here the Respondent countered that “socal” was an abbreviation for “Southern California” and that it uses the domain name “to host a website describing the real estate market in Southern California and providing information regarding Respondent’s real estate practice. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 3:30 am
” Hard Rock Café Int’l United States Inc., v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 10:54 am
Cybersecurity remains a real and pressing issue for businesses around the world. [read post]
19 Sep 2024, 9:36 am
Cases like Adair Estate v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 9:30 am
While Fourth La Costa pertained to real estate signs (i.e., commercial signs), the Court’s reasoning could similarly apply to restrictions on the number of noncommercial signs as well as the duration of display. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:56 am
This case is about a failed real estate partnership. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 7:20 pm
The CFA is aimed at unlawful sales and advertising practices designed to induce consumers to purchase merchandise or real estate. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:39 pm
Relevant Background and the Court’s Holdings On MootnessAnd CEQA’s Administrative Record Statute Plaintiff Golden Door, owner of a 600-acre spa and resort property in San Diego County, opposes a large mixed-use project (2,135 residential units and 81,000 square feet of commercial development) that has been proposed by developer Newland Real Estate Group, LLC in close proximity to its property on CEQA and other grounds. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 9:03 pm
Arguing in McBurney v. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 8:46 am
State v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm
EdwardsDocket: 10-708Issue(s): 1) Whether, under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 - which prohibits any referral fee for business incident to a real estate settlement service involving a federal-related mortgage loan, and holds any violator of this provision liable to the person charged for the settlement service - a private purchaser of real estate settlement services has standing to sue in federal court absent any claim that… [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:46 am
(“Simry”) was a family-owned real estate corporation with direct ownership and legal title to seven multi-unit residential real properties in Manhattan. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
This case was not an action that fit within the provision of CCP §39 “[f]or the recovery of real property, or of an estate or interest therein, or for the determination in any form, of that right or interest, and for injuries to real property” or “[f]or the foreclosure of all liens and mortgages on real property. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
The Legal Aid Society; Real Estate Board of New York; New York State Tenants & Neighbors Coalition, Inc. et al.; Community Housing Improvement Program of New York Inc. et al.; Maria del Carmen Arroyo et al.; Rent Stabilization Association of New York City, Inc.; Office of Manhattan Borough President; Urban Justice Center; Mitchell-Lama Residents Coalition, amici curiae. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
This case presents the following issue: When a lead agency performs a subsequent environmental review and prepares a subsequent environmental impact report, a subsequent negative declaration, or an addendum, is the agency’s decision reviewed under a substantial evidence standard of review (Mani Brothers Real Estate Group v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 10:22 am
(FIP), which leases real estate at an industrial park in Lakemoor, Ill. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 1:45 pm
Similarly, in applying the due process clause, the Court has extended its procedural protection "well beyond actual ownership of real estate, chattels, or money," Board of Regents v. [read post]
