Search for: "United States v. Real Estate One, Inc." Results 201 - 220 of 696
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2018, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“This action arises out of a failed residential real estate development project (the “Project”) which resulted in several federal and state court actions. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:42 am by Bethany Berger
The oral argument on Tuesday in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 7:42 am by Steven Cohen
Preferred Real Estate Investments, LLC, et al., – United States District Court – Southern District of Ohio – September 28th, 2018) involves alleged violations of the Fair Housing Act. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 6:55 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Medical expenses can be deducted in the inheritance tax.Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am by Kevin Kaufman
The state’s high and economically inefficient taxes are only one of several reasons for the outmigration of people and jobs, but taxes are an important consideration and one within policymakers’ power to address. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:16 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
As one of the most litigation heavy states in the United States, California court dockets are already at full capacity averaging one-and-a-half to two years from filing to finalized opinions. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:26 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
         Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 6:41 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Medical expenses can be deducted in the inheritance tax.Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-8160, apparently involving the same issue as the already granted United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Mark Walsh
Amex was sued by the United States and several states, who argued that the anti-steering provisions in its contracts with merchants violate federal antitrust law. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
United States without reaching the central question presented by the cert petition, which involved clarifying the rule of Marks v. [read post]