Search for: "United States v. Real Estate One, Inc." Results 361 - 380 of 696
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2014, 8:09 am by Bob Eisenbach
In doing so, it appeared to follow the long-standing Fourth Circuit decision in Lubrizol Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 8:09 am by Bob Eisenbach
In doing so, it appeared to follow the long-standing Fourth Circuit decision in Lubrizol Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 9:51 am by Larry Tolchinsky
  Our state’s real estate market is still recovering; Florida was often cited as number one in the nation for underwater mortgages and foreclosure filings. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm by John Palley
For purposes of this section, a contract, promise, undertaking or commitment to loan money secured solely by residential property consisting of one to four dwelling units shall be deemed to be for personal, family, or household purposes. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm by John Palley
For purposes of this section, a contract, promise, undertaking or commitment to loan money secured solely by residential property consisting of one to four dwelling units shall be deemed to be for personal, family, or household purposes. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 2:59 pm by Nikki Siesel
On April 20, 2006 the Applicant filed a trademark application for NATIONSTAR pro se with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 3:04 am by Larry Tolchinsky
     In fact, because so many chose a condominium as a preferred type of home ownership in Florida has meant that our state legislature has had to address countless unique legal issues related to this type of real estate ownership. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 5:21 pm by James Yang
Sept. 10, 2014), the Federal Circuit invalidated a patent claim as being indefinite under a new standard set forth by the Supreme Court of the United States in Biosig v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 5:00 am by Celia Taylor
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. may prove to be one worthy of closer consideration. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:30 am by Tiffany Hu
The court also rejected 3Taps’ attempt to invoke the Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 8:45 pm
Although the first prong of this two-prong test is not labeled as such, it is essentially the same type of inquiry as the "predominant purpose/secondary effects" test enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in City of Renton v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
This case presents the following issue: When a lead agency performs a subsequent environmental review and prepares a subsequent environmental impact report, a subsequent negative declaration, or an addendum, is the agency’s decision reviewed under a substantial evidence standard of review (Mani Brothers Real Estate Group v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 10:37 am by Ben
Monica Horten, a writer, policy analyst and visiting fellow at the LSE, looks at "copyright liability for cloud computing services hovering on the EU horizon" and asks what we can learn from the case of ABC Inc v Aereo in the United States Supreme Court  - over on the LSE Media Policy Project blog in a piece headed "Copyright Liabilities Loom for Cloud Providers in Wake of Aereo Judgement". [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:05 am
The Commonwealth further stated that its protocol would not violate [Gelfgatt’s] rights under . . . the 5h Amendment to the United States Constitution. . . . [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 10:30 am by Cicely Wilson
Nonetheless, the court concluded that the district court did not commit a reversible error where the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule under United States v. [read post]