Search for: "United States v. Real Estate One, Inc." Results 381 - 400 of 692
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am by Abbott & Kindermann
 The City prevailed on all issues but the general plan consistency issue pertaining to whether or not the City properly “coordinated” with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service as called for in the planning document. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 1:26 pm by Morgan Cloud
This analysis follows from the Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:57 pm by Cicely Wilson
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., United States Supreme Court (1/13/15)Banking, Consumer Law, Real Estate & Property LawExactly three years after borrowing money to refinance their home mortgage, the Jesinoskis sent the lender a letter purporting to rescind the transaction. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 9:47 pm
Flight 001, Inc., 2007 WL 2040588, *18-19 (S.D.N.Y.); Century 21 Real Estate, LLC v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:25 am by Peter J. Sluka
Like in Shatz, the parties in Kulick formed an LLC, known as SLP, as an investment vehicle—in this case for investment real properties in the Southeastern United States. [read post]
29 May 2016, 7:42 pm by Patricia Salkin
’ ” Here, Nextel’s real estate acquisition specialist drove in a one mile radius from the proposed site and found that there were no existing towers, tall structures or other suitable alternative locations within that area. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-8160, apparently involving the same issue as the already granted United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:38 pm by Bill Marler
United States, 607 F.2d 695, 702 (5th Cir.1979). [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 12:00 pm by Thomas James
By “valid mark,” I mean a mark that meets the requirements for one in the United States. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 10:47 am by Charles B. Jimerson, Esq.
Supp. 318, 330 (S.D.N.Y. 1990) (recognizing that loss causation of pleadings in real estate securities litigation is not sufficient in light of other plausible explanations for an investors’ ultimate disappointment, like a downturn in the real estate market.) [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 10:30 am by Cicely Wilson
Nonetheless, the court concluded that the district court did not commit a reversible error where the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule under United States v. [read post]
Noteworthy Trade Secret, Computer Fraud, and Non-Compete Cases In Golden Road Motor Inn, Inc. v. [read post]
Noteworthy Trade Secret, Computer Fraud, and Non-Compete Cases In Golden Road Motor Inn, Inc. v. [read post]