Search for: "United States v. Real Estate One, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 685
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Richard Zelichov and Trevor T. Garmey
Securities Litigation, 768 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2014) (violations of Section 303 do not give rise to private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5) with Stratte-McClure v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" No, said the California Supreme Court: [W]e are not persuaded that imposing a duty on landlords to withhold rental units from those they believe to be gang members is a fair or workable solution to [the] problem [of gang violence], or one consistent with our state's public policy as a whole. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 12:00 pm by Thomas James
By “valid mark,” I mean a mark that meets the requirements for one in the United States. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am by Eugene Volokh
In most of these jurisdictions (plus in South Carolina) it's also illegal to discriminate based on political activities in housing (and sometimes in commercial real estate transactions). [read post]
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]
Regarding exhaustion, the court reasoned that because the County’s hearing notice did not provide any notice of the CEQA grounds it would used to comply with CEQA, as stated in Tomlinson v. [read post]