Search for: "United States v. Regents of University of California" Results 1 - 20 of 217
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In support of its argument that NJT was an "arm of the state" entitled to invoke sovereign immunity, defendants cited a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit holding that NJT is entitled to invoke sovereign immunity in federal court (see Karns v Shanahan, 879 F3d 504, 519 [3d Cir 2018]). [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In support of its argument that NJT was an "arm of the state" entitled to invoke sovereign immunity, defendants cited a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit holding that NJT is entitled to invoke sovereign immunity in federal court (see Karns v Shanahan, 879 F3d 504, 519 [3d Cir 2018]). [read post]
27 Nov 2024, 10:38 am by Zachary Price
One would be to restore what I call "Bakke with bite":  the Court could hold, much as it did in earlier cases such as Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 11:15 am by David Greene
She has taught at New York University, the University of California - San Diego, Boston College Law School, and the American University of Paris. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 10:43 am by Arthur F. Coon
Regents of University of California (2024) 16 Cal.5th 43 (”Make UC II”), that noise from residents congregating on a USC-area residential housing project’s rooftop decks “do[es] not constitute a significant environmental effect impeding application of the Class 32 exemption[,]” including through attempted invocation of the unusual-circumstances exception. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 3:13 pm by Stephanie Lowe and Peter J. Brown
Board of Trustees of California State University (2005) 132 Cal.App.4th 359, has also determined that a paid administrative leave may constitute an adverse employment action in a discrimination case. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 11:22 am by Howard Friedman
The court said in part:In the year 2024, in the United States of America, in the State of California, in the City of Los Angeles, Jewish students were excluded from portions of the UCLA campus because they refused to denounce their faith. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 3:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
Regents: In the year 2024, in the United States of America, in the State of California, in the City of Los Angeles, Jewish students were excluded from portions of the UCLA campus because they refused to denounce their faith. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 3:32 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
When a DACA recipient who has been unlawfully present in the United States for a lengthy period of time leaves the United States to apply for an employment-based visa at a U.S. consulate abroad, they are likely to trigger the 3- or 10-year bars pursuant to INA § 212(a)(9)(B).Under INA § 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(I) a person who is unlawfully present for more than 180 days but less than 1 year, and who voluntarily departs the US prior to the commencement of… [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rosenbaum, Amanda Mangaser Savage, Kathryn Eidmann and Sarah Camiscoli of the bar of the State of the State of LA, California, of counsel), for appellants.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Mark S. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rosenbaum, Amanda Mangaser Savage, Kathryn Eidmann and Sarah Camiscoli of the bar of the State of the State of LA, California, of counsel), for appellants.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Mark S. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am by Michael C. Dorf
Wade--was a Burger Court decision, as was its compromise ruling on affirmative action, Regents of the Univ. of California v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 10:41 am by Josh Blackman
Regents of the University of California comes to mind: Justice Holmes famously wrote that "[m]en must turn square corners when they deal with the Government. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:46 am by Justin Mahramas
Regents of University of California (2023) 88 Cal.App.5th 656.[3] AB 1307 expressly provides that unamplified noise from the occupants and guests of residential projects is not a significant impact as defined by CEQA. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:50 am by Arthur F. Coon
  (California’s other “great water project” is the Central Valley Project (“CVP”) operated by the United States Bureau of Reclamation (“USBR”), which stores and distributes water to the Central Valley primarily for agricultural use.) [read post]