Search for: "United States v. Regents of University of California"
Results 181 - 200
of 237
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
Nor does it make sense for the Court to warn schools – for the third time, after University of California Regents v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Regents of the University of California, the Court this term rejected the government’s attempt to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:46 am
Regents of University of California (2023) 88 Cal.App.5th 656.[3] AB 1307 expressly provides that unamplified noise from the occupants and guests of residential projects is not a significant impact as defined by CEQA. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85 (EFF) (Ars Technica)… [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:06 am
Regents of the University of California, 17-1003. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 7:52 am
When not coaching the Cavaliers, Heikkinen divided his time between his legal studies and his involvement with the University of Virginia’s Flight Preparatory School which was established as part of the United States Navy’s V-12 program during the Second World War. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
(2) Does the Federal Power Act preempt state court challenges to an environmental impact report prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to comply with the federal water quality certification under the federal Clean Water Act? [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
(2) Does the Federal Power Act preempt state court challenges to an environmental impact report prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to comply with the federal water quality certification under the federal Clean Water Act? [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am
United States, 18-7096. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm
City of Newport Beach, California v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am
Regents of the University of California, 18-587 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’ decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 8:12 am
Regents of the University of California, the Cato Institute and Professor Jeremy Rabkin took a different approach. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 2:56 am
Mapp v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:35 am
Kevin Starr (ArsTechnica) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Liberty Media Holdings – Biggest ever BitTorrent piracy settlement is intriguing (TorrentFreak) Pink Visual – Porn company rejects mass lawsuits, goes after torrent sites (TorrentFreak) Sony – Sony sues over Playstation 3 security hack (IP Osgoode) US Copyright Group – Forget Hurt Locker; P2P lawyers lower sights to Massive Asses 5 (ArsTechnica) Viacom – The Viacom appeal: Viacom v… [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
See Grace United Methodist Church v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
(2) Does the Federal Power Act preempt state court challenges to an environmental impact report prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to comply with the federal water quality certification under the federal Clean Water Act? [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 7:56 am
United States, the court resolved an issue of keen interest to a limited niche of immigrants. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 12:27 pm
Regents of University of California (1988 [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 9:06 pm
Regents of the University of California—a case about a DHS memo rescinding another well-known but separate policy known as DACA—the Court found here that the DHS secretary had issued his second Remain in Mexico memo with several new explanations for ending MPP. [read post]
