Search for: "United States v. Regents of University of California" Results 41 - 60 of 235
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2021, 6:38 pm by Amy Howe
Regents of the University of California, which rejected the Trump administration’s efforts to terminate the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, an Obama-era policy that protected people who were brought as children to the U.S. without authorization. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:52 pm by Unknown
Regents of the University of California that a patient did not retain a property interest in tissue extracted from him. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:52 pm by Unknown
Regents of the University of California that a patient did not retain a property interest in tissue extracted from him. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Robins, which upheld a state law rule that required large shopping malls to allow leafleters and signature gatherers (a rule that has since been applied by some lower courts to outdoor spaces in private universities[113]); Turner Broadcasting System v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 9:05 pm by Kristin E. Hickman
Regents of the University of California involved the legality of executive actions related to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 5:01 am by David S. Rubenstein
Regents of University of California, the court took pains to avoid declaring any judicial or congressional limits on DHS’s prosecutal discretion when it rebuked the Trump administration’s attempt to repeal DACA. [read post]
(2) Does the Federal Power Act preempt state court challenges to an environmental impact report prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to comply with the federal water quality certification under the federal Clean Water Act? [read post]
(2) Does the Federal Power Act preempt state court challenges to an environmental impact report prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to comply with the federal water quality certification under the federal Clean Water Act? [read post]
Regents of the University of California, et al. agreeing with some federal courts that the reasoning given for DACA’s rescission was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), which governs the process by which federal agencies develop and issue regulations. [read post]
Regents of the University of California, et al. agreeing with some federal courts that the reasoning given for DACA’s rescission was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), which governs the process by which federal agencies develop and issue regulations. [read post]
(2) Does the Federal Power Act preempt state court challenges to an environmental impact report prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to comply with the federal water quality certification under the federal Clean Water Act? [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
Así fue cómo Thurgood Marshall —el destacado jurista, activista y principal abogado del caso Brown v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
Regents of the University of California decision blocking the Trump Administration’s attempt to end the DACA program. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Richard J. Pierce, Jr.
Regents of the University of California, the Court this term rejected the government’s attempt to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Stephen Lee
Regents of University of California, rejecting the Trump Administration’s attempt to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:04 am by Kalvis Golde
Regents of the University of California, 5-4) Struck down a Louisiana law that required doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital. [read post]