Search for: "United States v. Regents of University of California" Results 61 - 80 of 228
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2011, 4:28 pm by Betsy McKenzie
The Regents of the University of California et al. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 12:34 am
Finally, this   part of the book discusses the impact of the ruling in Regents of the University of California v Eli Lilly & Co and how  this case has influenced the application of the written description requirement in the US. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 1:30 pm by Frank J. Fanshawe
In December, a student hacker committed a “brute force” attack on Naviance, an ed-tech provider that collects sensitive information on behalf of school districts throughout the United States. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:00 pm by Brad Dixon
To begin, the Ninth Circuit specifically concluded that the United States Supreme Court decision in NCAA v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Peter Margulies
Regents of the University of California, faulting the Trump administration’s stated reasoning for rescinding Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), the administration’s wisest approach may be a fresh, more comprehensive explanation of its reasons for ending MPP. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Regents of Univ. of California, 793 P.2d 479 (Cal. 1990) (property interest in one’s genetic material)15. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 12:52 am
Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma, 468 U.S. 85, 101-103 (1984) ("NCAA"). [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In his controlling opinion in the 1978 case of Regents of Univ. of California v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 6:21 am by Amanda Rice
Regents of the University of California, a challenge to California’s policy of offering in-state tuition rates to illegal immigrants to attend state high schools. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:17 am by John Elwood
Regents of the University of California, 18-587, Trump v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Peter Margulies
Regents of the University of California, the Supreme Court held that the Trump administration had failed to engage in “reasoned decisionmaking” under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) when the administration sought to end President Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. [read post]