Search for: "United States v. Regents of University of California"
Results 141 - 160
of 237
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:33 pm
The argument was in University of California Regents v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 8:58 am
Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 393, citations and internal quotations omitted.) [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 5:09 pm
For example, for the purposes of salary and wage deductions in relation to employee organization membership dues and related fees, the Bill defines a “public employer” as the state, Regents of the University of California, the Trustees of the California State University, as well as the California State University itself, the Judicial Council, a trial court, a county, city, district, public… [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 9:06 am
The first affirmative action case to be decided by the Supreme Court, Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
This case presents the following issue: Is the issuance of a well permit pursuant to state groundwater well-drilling standards a discretionary decision subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:44 am
The Regents of the University of California, et al. (2020) 51 Cal.App.5th 226. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm
Consider the Court’s 1978 decision in Bakke (Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 10:41 am
Regents of the University of California comes to mind: Justice Holmes famously wrote that "[m]en must turn square corners when they deal with the Government. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:59 pm
United Airlines (7th Cir. 1971); Regents of University of California v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:14 pm
Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 405 (“Laurel Heights I”)); and (2) “make[ ] a reasonable effort to substantively connect a project’s air quality impacts to likely health consequences. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 2:52 am
On June 26, 1978, the Court ruled in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
United States, 17-6540, Orr v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 3:15 am
United States and Department of Commerce 393 F.3d 1277 (Fed. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:22 am
” In summarizing its conclusion, the Court stated: “An analysis of the various permutations of the project alternatives establishes that if residential units were added, commercial space was subtracted. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 12:35 am
The case is Olson v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:53 pm
Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 393.) [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm
United States On 22 January 2019 the US Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to take up an appeal in Hassell v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:23 am
Most notably, New York and fifteen other states, and the District of Columbia, filed suitin the Eastern District of New York; and the Regents of the University of California filed suitin the Northern District of California, together with former DHS Secretary Napolitano, who is now President of the University of California. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
Regents of the University of California, Trump v. [read post]
