Search for: "United States v. Reveles"
Results 1 - 20
of 704
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2018, 9:12 am
United States, 320 U.S. 81 (1943). [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 6:06 pm
United States... [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 11:48 am
Revelation Capital Mgmt., Ltd – United States District Court – Southern District of New York – July 8th, 2016 – This case involves a short sale of securities. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 11:48 am
Revelation Capital Mgmt., Ltd – United States District Court – Southern District of New York – July 8th, 2016 – This case involves a short sale of securities. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:00 am
The transactions at issue in this case were not subject to Rule 105 because while the short sales took place on the NYSE, the activities related to the subsequent purchase of the same securities in an offering occurred entirely outside of the United States (SEC v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:39 pm
The case, which involved mast for drunk driving, is United States v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 8:54 am
” The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit was affirmed. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:10 am
See also United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 1:41 pm
United States, in which the court on political question grounds affirmed dismissal of a suit seeking damages in relation to a 2012 drone strike in Yemen. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 11:03 pm
In Continental Casualty et al. v United States of America et al, U.S. [read post]
W.D.Wash.: Bank robbery tracking devices are sufficiently reliable to alone establish probable cause
6 Dec 2011, 5:39 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 12:19 pm
Revels, 41 C.M.R. 475 (A.C.M.R. 1969); United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 10:28 am
This week, a federal court in Oregon rebuffed him; the following post summarizes the most recent developments in United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
Four years later, in November 2017, the case was finally heard by a chamber of the ECHR alongside two related cases that also brought allegations under Article 8: the Bureau of Investigative Journalism and Alice Ross v. the United Kingdom (2014) and 10 Human Rights Organisations and Others v. the United Kingdom (2015). [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:27 pm
The Grand Chamber stated in Cumpana v Romania on 17 December 2004 at paragraph 91, in the context of a publication covered by Article 10, that Article 8 “may require the adoption of positive measures designed to secure effective respect for private life even in the sp [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 8:29 pm
United States, the Supreme Court recognized the Government's right to invoke the common law state secrets privilege, which allows the Government to withhold evidence from discovery because its revelation would threaten the nation's security. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 5:35 pm
As the United States Supreme Court explained long ago in Hudson v. [read post]
