Search for: "United States v. Rice"
Results 281 - 300
of 539
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2015, 7:25 am
In the Syngenta matter, the GM trait was approved in the United States and other countries. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 9:00 pm
It would therefore be wise to keep in mind the ruling of the Supreme Court of 6 December 1954 in the case of Holland v United States (348 U.S. 121, 137-138 [1954]): Circumstantial evidence in this respect is intrinsically no different from testimonial evidence. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 11:16 am
And while the United States is still floundering for a strategy, the United Kingdom just released its own public strategy to combat the Islamic State. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 10:49 am
” He also called the threat of a terrorist group launching a cyberattack on the United States a “small but potentially growing problem. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 10:14 am
The United States Supreme Court case of American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
United States, decided in 1878. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 5:05 am
Rice’s Note contributes to the debate on Chief Justice Roberts’ claim in NFIB v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:05 am
Blue Buffalo Company Ltd. v. [read post]
16 May 2015, 4:44 pm
The first of these is the Iraqi biological weapons program dating back to the 1970s and 80s, which came under intense scrutiny by the United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM) from 1991-1994, following the end of the First Gulf War. [read post]
16 May 2015, 3:17 pm
Under this charge, the question boils down to this: do you think that this evidence shows that these people "willfully injured national-defense premises" with the "intent to injure, interfere with, or obstruct the national defense of the United States"? [read post]
13 May 2015, 7:58 am
Oliva et al. v. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm
’s Office v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:31 am
Olah, “My Search for Carbocations and Their Role in Chemistry,” Nobel Lecture (Dec. 8, 1994), quoting George von Békésy, Experiments in Hearing 8 (N.Y. 1960); see also McMillan v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 12:12 pm
If a company harvests rice grown in China, the rice is a product of China. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 11:42 am
The Court ruled 6-3 on March 25 in Young v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 6:23 am
Case Background After Bayer introduced genetically modified rice into the United States rice supply, rice farmers and others involved in the rice business brought more than 200 suits against Bayer and other entities, including Riceland Foods, in state and federal courts. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 9:46 am
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Wells noted the opening of a week-long hearing in the military commission case, United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 3:00 am
In 2006, the USDA announced that the rice supply in the United States had been contaminated by Bayer’s genetically modified rice. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm
We focus first on the landmark 1813 case Queen v. [read post]
