Search for: "United States v. Rice"
Results 381 - 400
of 539
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2011, 1:58 am
(IPKat) United Kingdom IPO changes wording of Patent Rules (Out-Law) Online design registration – latest news (IPKat) (IPKat) PCC Page 37: The Octopus – keeping documents up its sleeve (PatLit) Neatly wrapped: UDR in the PCC: Albert Packaging & Ors v Nampak Cartons & Healthcare (JIPLP) Perplexing perpetual protection (not Peter Pan) (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US Patent Reform Patent reform 2011: Vote scheduled at the… [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 2:27 am
In the case of Todd Roth v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 10:32 am
(See INS v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:12 pm
Justice Edwards in 410263 B.C. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:12 pm
Justice Edwards in 410263 B.C. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:22 pm
Friday’s Fosler grant du jour went to the Army for a specified Fosler issue in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:15 am
" This dictum about public "persua[sive]" speech later became the basis for the indictment -- which the district court refused to dismiss on First Amendment grounds -- in United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm
(Class 99) (Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC (Ch): Plane users can’t tell airlines from airways: United Airlines Inc v United Airways Limited (IPKat) PPC page 32: Quickstep – are there difficulties changing course with 8 tentacles? [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 12:13 am
Uzamere should've read the fine print.In Uzamere v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 12:13 am
In Uzamere v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:10 am
United States, the Court had the opportunity to clarify the Armed Career Criminal Act (the “ACCA”), the federal government’s version of a “three strikes” law. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
CONDOLEEZZA RICE. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:25 am
” The United States has made no attempt to defend or justify what it had done to Arar. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:35 pm
" United States v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 5:00 am
From a complaint filed last week in San Francisco: Michael M ____ v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm
” Over time, these restrictions were removed – a trend most dramatically marked by the 1967 United States Supreme Court ruling in Loving v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm
” Over time, these restrictions were removed – a trend most dramatically marked by the 1967 United States Supreme Court ruling in Loving v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:09 am
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006). [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:09 am
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006). [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:20 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
