Search for: "United States v. Rice" Results 41 - 60 of 490
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2017, 5:39 pm by Pillsbury's Construction Law Team
Additional Source: Securing Rights-of-Way to CO2 Pipeline Corridors in the United States; The Future of Carbon Dioxide Injection EOR in the United States [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 7:20 am by Bridget Crawford
The Supreme Court of the United States will take up this question this term in the context of North Carolina Department of Revenue v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 7:42 am
  Even though the products were not sold in the United States, under the Fifth Circuit's decision in American Rice, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 7:47 am by
Today the United States Supreme Court reversed the second habeas corpus grant within a week. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 1:39 pm by Unknown
United States (Tribal Police; Tribal Law and Order Act) Hawk v. [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 11:27 am
Sponsored Topics: Supreme Court - United States - Government - Judicial Branch - Barack Obama [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 6:46 am by MBettman
At issue are certified questions of state law from the United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio, Western Division. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 1:16 pm by NARF
United States (Bad Men Clause; Court of Federal Claims) State Courts Bulletin In re H.V. [read post]
17 May 2022, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
That rejection was correct under Montana election law, the majority held: There is one Section within [Montana election law]—the Montana Absent Uniformed Services and Overseas Voter Act—that expressly authorizes the use of "digital signatures" for active-duty United States military members and United States citizens residing outside the United States but eligible to vote. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:14 pm
 On 10 December 2004, United Riceland Private Ltd (now Tilda Riceland Private Ltd) opposed on the basis of its use in the course of trade of the earlier non-registered sign BASMATI for rice. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 10:08 am by Guest Blogger
  In response, the State of Wyoming argued—as it had successfully below—that the dispute was squarely governed by the Court’s decision in Ward v. [read post]