Search for: "United States v. Rice" Results 141 - 160 of 513
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2011, 6:17 am by James Bickford
-citizen mothers outside of the United States, and those born to unmarried U.S. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 7:41 am by Steven Cohen
Facts:  This case (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 10:27 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
Dog Bite Statistics in Baltimore, Maryland According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), almost 5 million people are bitten by dogs every year in the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 10:35 pm by Marcel Pemsel
This question is going to be answered in EUIPO v Nowhere (case C-337/22 P) for opposition proceedings and in Shopify v EUIPO (case C-751/22 P) in invalidity proceedings. [read post]
[9] NHANES is publicly available consumer use data and “is designed to be representative of the entire population in the United States, and to capture how often foods are consumed, when they are consumed and how much is consumed … . [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 7:31 am by Steve Vladeck
Every jurisdiction in the United States requires at least some criminal defendants to make certain payments to the government tied to their convictions. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Ethan Yan
For those who haven’t looked at that Amendment recently, its words provide, quite straightforwardly, that, for citizens of the United States who are at least eighteen, the right to vote “shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state on account of age” (emphasis added).Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas grant absentee-voting eligibility specifically for all voters sixty-five or older, while… [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 7:05 am by Aurora Barnes
The petitions of the week are: United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:45 pm by Priscilla Smith
S 2000bb(b) (1).[3] Smith, 494 U.S. at 887 (equating evaluation of centrality with, inter alia, substantiality) (citing United States v. [read post]