Search for: "United States v. Richmond" Results 201 - 220 of 559
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
" But even if they were compelled, he adequately waived his Garrityprotections, United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 9:11 am by Steve Minor
The Benchbook is perhaps the best resource on law and practice in the district courts.In 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided Turner v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 10:51 am by Richard Renner
Given that Congress created the FCA’s qui tam right to bring suit in the name of the United States, Congress certainly could add conditions to safeguard the interests of the United States. [read post]
25 May 2017, 6:15 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
In a 10-to-3 decision, the Richmond-based court said the president’s power to deny entry into the United States is not absolute and sided with challengers, finding that the travel ban “in context drips with religious intolerance, animus and discrimination. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 1:31 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUIT Criminal Practice Sentence Is Vacated, Remanded; Court's Notice Of Upward Departure from Guidelines Insufficient United States v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 1:23 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticePrior Shoplifting Offenses Not ‘Similar' to Passing Bad Check; No Error in Criminal History Computation United States, appellee v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 5:32 am by David G. Badertscher
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeSentence Is Vacated, Remanded; Court's Notice Of Upward Departure from Guidelines Insufficient United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:08 am
Penal Law §120.25 Not 'Crime of Violence' Under USSG §4B1.2(a)(2) United States, appellee v. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 12:35 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeDeportee's Sentence Vacatur Motion Denied; Claim Would Have Been Successive Habeas Petition United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 6:05 am
Kera LLC (No. 137347), to the Michigan Association of United Ways; in Allen v. [read post]