Search for: "United States v. Richmond" Results 41 - 60 of 554
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Steinbach, once a litigation partner Williams & Connolly LLP and latterly a teacher of United States History and American Government courses at the Sidwell Friends School in Washington, DC, on how United States history can also be taught and understood by focusing on constitutional history (YouTube). [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:00 am by Heidi Meinzer
PHH removed the matter to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division, and moved to dismiss the action under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 8:04 pm
The Secretary downplayed the significance of the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
Trial evidence supported the district court’s judgment, blocking registration of VAGISAN in the United States. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 4:17 am by Robert Margolis
Case date: 01 August 2019 Case number: No. 18-1477 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 3:57 am by newgenblog
Court of Appeals in Richmond has vacated a decision rejecting as time-barred false association and false advertising claims by Bayer Consumer Care, AG, against competitor Belmora LLC over use of the mark FLANAX for naproxen sodium pain relieves in the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:13 am by Andrew Hamm
United States and argues that “[w]hat’s at stake in this case is whether the justices will… make it easier for prosecutors to pursue certain types of insider trading claims. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:35 am by Kevin Walsh
This second appeal–United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
  In her scholarly paper, Professor Hodges proposes instituting a negotiation or bargaining requirement into employment contracts in order to protect employee rights in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s recent Epic Systems v. [read post]