Search for: "United States v. Richmond"
Results 61 - 80
of 544
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2021, 8:51 am
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT Page 1 of 1 Richmond, VA (5/25/2021 - Session) Tuesday, May 25, 2021 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ US v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 2:00 am
Court of Appeals in Richmond has vacated a decision rejecting as time-barred false association and false advertising claims by Bayer Consumer Care, AG, against competitor Belmora LLC over use of the mark FLANAX for naproxen sodium pain relieves in the United States. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:16 am
Villanueva National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 8:45 am
., LLC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 3:57 am
Court of Appeals in Richmond has vacated a decision rejecting as time-barred false association and false advertising claims by Bayer Consumer Care, AG, against competitor Belmora LLC over use of the mark FLANAX for naproxen sodium pain relieves in the United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2021, 1:26 pm
Matal v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 6:00 am
Textualism After Bostock Bostock v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 6:07 am
Case date: 26 January 2021 Case number: No. 19-2390 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 9:05 am
McCullough Richmond: Anitra T. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 7:00 am
Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 7:29 am
This is true in most states, including Florida. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
The Project is owned and operated by the United States Bureau of Reclamation (“Bureau”) and discharges significant quantities of selenium and other pollutants into state and federal wildlife refuges leading into the Delta. [read post]
31 Oct 2020, 9:07 am
People v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:29 am
First up: the state-court case of Shahrokh Mireskandari v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:14 pm
But a partly public funding program limited to people of particular races or ethnic groups generally violates the Equal Protection Clause (see, e.g., City of Richmond v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 1:01 am
The case of United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 1:23 pm
The case that I will be discussing in this post is Royal Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 11:18 pm
From Judge Leo Sorokin's decision Monday in U.S. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 12:36 pm
” It follows the Trump v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:06 pm
The United States Attorney, George Hay, would only offer to provide a redacted copy of the letter, with certain portions excluded. [read post]
