Search for: "United States v. Rider"
Results 201 - 220
of 338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2018, 12:34 am
In the Unites States, a federal judge followed the same line of reasoning in the case Razak v Uber when he decided that Uber drivers are independent contractors because they “work when they want to and are free to nap, run personal errands, or take smoke breaks between trips”. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 5:00 pm
The case, 159 MP Corp. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:00 pm
The conduct was certainly disturbing, but the court, in Washington v. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 10:02 pm
Coetzee is in the US, where he notes Bridgeman v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 12:30 am
We literally put on 100’s of events all over the United States every year for charity and to help others. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 2:19 pm
United States that location data is incredibly sensitive personal information, and that it is protected by the Fourth Amendment’s reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 8:23 pm
However, our Circuit has interpreted Robertson v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 4:36 pm
Carlton Fields Fishing Trip Sponsored Topics: Mark Cuban - sport - Dallas Mavericks - United States - InsiderTrading [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:05 pm
The department received 75 applications and selected 40 (including the sergeant), to participate in horse and rider evaluations. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 8:00 am
It is styled, Stillwagoner v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 11:37 am
, Marcavage v. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 1:45 am
Yesterday (Friday), the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit handed down a ruling (PDF) on Oracle's appeal of the USPTO's rejection (affirmed in November 2013 by a Patent Trial and Appeal Board, basically a USPTO-internal court) of various claims of U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 8:04 am
Because unions have a binding legal duty to act in the interest of all workers included in the unit, the labor organizations want to collect fees even from “free riders,” as they call non-union workers. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 11:20 am
Ohio v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 5:11 pm
Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 10:49 am
The decision in Janus v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 10:49 am
The decision in Janus v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
