Search for: "United States v. Rider"
Results 101 - 120
of 338
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2018, 7:35 pm
The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Janus v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:56 pm
Janus v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:03 pm
This morning the Supreme Court issued its long-awaited opinion in Janus v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 10:49 am
The decision in Janus v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 10:49 am
The decision in Janus v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:05 am
Janus v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 8:07 am
Facts: This case (MCMANUS v. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 6:27 am
Schenk, 2018 VT 45By Charlie ButtreyWriting for the majority in the 2012 case United States v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:34 am
In the Unites States, a federal judge followed the same line of reasoning in the case Razak v Uber when he decided that Uber drivers are independent contractors because they “work when they want to and are free to nap, run personal errands, or take smoke breaks between trips”. [read post]
17 May 2018, 9:33 am
See United Jersey Bank v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 9:45 pm
A final approach may entail handing back more regulatory power to the states and localities, creating a natural experiment of the type described by Justice Louis Brandeis in New State Ice Co. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 6:04 am
Beginning on Jan. 20, 2022, and every four years thereafter—cleverly scheduled to fall one year after the inauguration day for each new presidential term—the president must provide Congress with a report on the activities that the United States is pursuing under the 2018 AUMF and make a recommendation as to whether Congress should repeal, modify, or leave the 2018 AUMF in place. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:24 pm
A simple rider on an appropriations bill could add the seven little words that statu [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 7:17 pm
The responsibility to share the cost of the bargaining unit is necessary because without it, workers can be “free riders,” getting the benefits of their unions’ efforts while refusing to pay for it. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 8:20 am
The union also states that some bargaining units aren’t viable without a requirement that all employees share in the cost of representation. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 8:20 am
The union also states that some bargaining units aren’t viable without a requirement that all employees share in the cost of representation. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 11:20 am
Ohio v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
In Harris v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 8:24 am
In Midler v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:54 pm
Exclusivity – the driver was not required to provide services only to Uber riders. [read post]
