Search for: "United States v. Rios" Results 1 - 20 of 229
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2021, 3:12 pm by fvanloon
Section 4(b) required certain states and local governments to obtain a predetermination by the United States Attorney General or a three-judge panel of the U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 8:15 am by Unknown
The OA articles in this listing were previously referenced on this blog as of 1 January 2021.Bronze OA:"An Analysis of the ECtHR Judgment in the Case of N.D. and N.T. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Quoted in 10 years after landmark Citizens United Supreme Court decision, record cash flooding US elections, ABC News (Jan. 20, 2020). [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 9:02 am by Jonathan H. Adler
In the southwestern United States, the Pecos River begins near Santa Fe, New Mexico, and winds its way south for hundreds of miles through New Mexico and Texas before flowing into the Rio Grande River on the Texas-Mexico border. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm by fjhinojosa
Gonzalez is cited in the following case: Kim Cramton v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 5:37 pm by fvanloon
District Court for the District of Columbia on behalf of the Daily Caller News Foundation (Daily Caller News Foundation v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 11:58 am by Unknown
Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (Declaratory Relief; Tribal Health Organizations)United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 8:34 am
Most interesting here is the way in which the reconstitution of state borders in the wake of COVID, non-state collectives now seek the authority to both mark territory and to police those borders against outsiders. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 3:03 pm by James Campbell
We obtained the records through our August 2018 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 1:34 pm by Craig Newby and Jeffrey Conner
The program provides recipients with the ability to apply for work authorizations, which allow them to work legally in the United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am by Schachtman
 The Act gave all participants in a qualifying “professional review action” immunity from being held liable in damages “under any law of the United States or of any State (or political subdivision thereof) with respect to the action. [read post]