Search for: "United States v. Rios" Results 201 - 220 of 348
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm by Larry Catá Backer
  On the 2012 Roundtable, see, Paper Delivered at the 2012 Penn State Law and Semiotics Roundtable: The Corporation as Semiosis, “Citizens United,” the Signification of the Corporate Enterprise and the Development of Law Law at the End of the Day, March 3, 2012; on the 2011 Roundtable see Larry Catá Backer, The 2011 Kevelson Workshop on Law and Semiotics at Penn State--Outstanding Student Presentations,  Law at the End of the Day, April 11,… [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 12:53 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The child was citizen of the United States of America and of the Republic of Argentina. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:25 pm by Jon L. Gelman
" The soldiers, in 2003, provided military protection to civilian teams who were working to restore operations as part of the Project Restore Iraqi Oil (RIO) on behalf of the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 6:47 am
Contents include:ArticlesJames Nedumpara, Corporate Tax Reform Proposals in the United States: What Lessons Can Be Learnt from the past GATT/WTO Jurisprudence? [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:43 pm by Donald Childress
  Assuming the ATS survives in some way, the questions will now be choice of law – which is why the Rio Tinto PLC v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 5:25 pm
" They contacted United States authorities when the boat did not turn around but nothing happened. [read post]
Or as Marshall put it in 1800: “[T]he people of the United States have no jurisdiction over offenses committed on board a foreign ship against a foreign nation. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:00 am by Eugene Kontorovich
Or as Marshall put it in 1800: “[T]he people of the United States have no jurisdiction over offenses committed on board a foreign ship against a foreign nation. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 9:53 pm by John Knox
For a couple of reasons, the presumption against extraterritoriality doesn’t apply neatly to ATS claims, as the Ninth and DC Circuits said in their 2011 decisions in Sarei v Rio Tinto and Doe VIII v Exxon Mobil. [read post]