Search for: "United States v. Rios"
Results 221 - 240
of 364
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Darin v. Olivero-Huffman, 2012 WL 3542514 (D. Puerto Rico)[Argentina] [Habitual Residence] [Consent]
27 Aug 2012, 12:53 pm
The child was citizen of the United States of America and of the Republic of Argentina. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:25 pm
" The soldiers, in 2003, provided military protection to civilian teams who were working to restore operations as part of the Project Restore Iraqi Oil (RIO) on behalf of the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 6:47 am
Contents include:ArticlesJames Nedumpara, Corporate Tax Reform Proposals in the United States: What Lessons Can Be Learnt from the past GATT/WTO Jurisprudence? [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:43 pm
Assuming the ATS survives in some way, the questions will now be choice of law – which is why the Rio Tinto PLC v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 9:37 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:48 pm
The United States Supreme Court, in Christopher et al. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 8:29 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 6:57 pm
United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 342, 246 Fed.Appx. 7 (2d Cir.2007) (same). [read post]
18 May 2012, 6:57 pm
United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 342, 246 Fed.Appx. 7 (2d Cir.2007) (same). [read post]
5 May 2012, 8:13 am
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:06 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 5:25 pm
" They contacted United States authorities when the boat did not turn around but nothing happened. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
Or as Marshall put it in 1800: “[T]he people of the United States have no jurisdiction over offenses committed on board a foreign ship against a foreign nation. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
Or as Marshall put it in 1800: “[T]he people of the United States have no jurisdiction over offenses committed on board a foreign ship against a foreign nation. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 9:53 pm
For a couple of reasons, the presumption against extraterritoriality doesn’t apply neatly to ATS claims, as the Ninth and DC Circuits said in their 2011 decisions in Sarei v Rio Tinto and Doe VIII v Exxon Mobil. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:22 am
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:23 pm
Although Rio Tinto has operations in many countries, including the United States, and Sarei lived in the United States as a resident alien when the complaint was filed, nothing done by Americans or in America, is at issue. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:03 pm
The Court’s order directs the parties to file supplemental briefs on whether the ATS “allows courts to recognize a cause of action for violations of the law of nations occurring within the territory of a sovereign other than the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:34 pm
Apparently, in reviewing the cert petition in Rio Tinto v. [read post]
