Search for: "United States v. Rios"
Results 221 - 240
of 344
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2012, 9:53 pm
For a couple of reasons, the presumption against extraterritoriality doesn’t apply neatly to ATS claims, as the Ninth and DC Circuits said in their 2011 decisions in Sarei v Rio Tinto and Doe VIII v Exxon Mobil. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 7:22 am
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:23 pm
Although Rio Tinto has operations in many countries, including the United States, and Sarei lived in the United States as a resident alien when the complaint was filed, nothing done by Americans or in America, is at issue. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:03 pm
The Court’s order directs the parties to file supplemental briefs on whether the ATS “allows courts to recognize a cause of action for violations of the law of nations occurring within the territory of a sovereign other than the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:34 pm
Apparently, in reviewing the cert petition in Rio Tinto v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:01 am
In addition, there is a strong chance that the Court next Term could be reexamining its controversial ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:35 am
Rio Tinto case decided in October. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:10 pm
Rio Tinto case decided in October. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 11:55 am
Rio Tinto in the Ninth Circuit, also raise the issue. [read post]
Media Law Review of the Year 2011: Defamation, Contempt, Privacy and a Public Inquiry – Jude Townend
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
Max Mosley went to the European Court of Human Rights with his application against the United Kingdom. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:51 pm
The Supreme Court heard arguments in the case U.S. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Cases where the foreign state was not party to the Convention Rio Props., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:15 pm
As previously reported here, the United States Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in the case of Kiobel v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
’[3] On the question of domestic law the Court finds that ‘the law of the United States has been uniform since its founding that corporations can be held liable for the torts committed by their agents. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:15 am
Lawyers » United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 6:51 am
United States and Hill v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 3:35 pm
In Sarei v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 5:32 am
Crespo-Rios, 645 F.3d 37, 43 (1st Cir. 2011) (citing cases); United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
Rio Tinto. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 2:54 pm
by Roger Alford Donald “Trey” Childress has the scoop: Today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a mammoth en banc opinion in the case of Sarei v. [read post]
