Search for: "United States v. Robbins" Results 1 - 20 of 254
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2019, 7:49 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Baskin-Robbins Franchising is in the business of franchising independent businesses and people to operate Baskin-Robbins shops in the United States. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 1:37 pm by Jeff Redding
Windsor" I'm sure that I'm continuing to miss new pieces on United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 4:29 am
The United States Supreme Court decided yesterday a malicious prosecution/RICO case with a Fourth and Fifth Amendment implication yesterday: Wilkie v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 12:59 pm
Alex Robbins, one of the authors (along with Lynda Lao) of The Effect of Presumptions: An Empirical Examination of Inter-Circuit Sentencing Disparities After United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 11:22 pm by Brandon Lovested
In a court filing (Blake J Robbins v Lower Merion School District), the parents of student Blake Robbins are suing the school district for: invasion of privacy theft of personal information violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act abrogating the Computer Fraud Abuse Act abridging the Stored Communications Act running afoul of section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act and ignoring the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution the… [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 4:33 pm
  The article by Alex Robbins and Lynda Lao is entitled "The Effect of Presumptions: An Empirical Examination of Inter-Circuit Sentencing Disparities After United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 10:23 am by Blake Osborn
Conlon of the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, will decide whether to impose sanctions on the plaintiffs’ firm for its conduct regarding a confidential witness in the City of Livonia Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 11:40 am by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-5165 Issue: Whether Richardson v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:23 pm by Kate Howard
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit erred in refusing to apply the presumption that congress intends positive law to retain common law principles absent clear evidence to the contrary, United States v. [read post]