Search for: "United States v. Robinson"
Results 241 - 260
of 950
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2019, 4:10 am
” In the most recent episode of SCOTUStalk, Kimberly Robinson joins Amy Howe to discuss last week’s oral argument in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:59 am
United States, which asks when a defendant must have formed the intent required to commit burglary for purposes of a “violent felony” under the Armed Career Criminal Act, comes from Rory Little. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:04 am
” At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that during yesterday afternoon’s other argument, in Rehaif v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 1:58 pm
The United State Supreme Court issued a recent decision – Stokeling v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:54 am
At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that after yesterday’s oral argument in Food Marketing Institute v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 4:07 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
This blog’s analysis of Tuesday’s opinion in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 7:17 am
Facts: This case (Robinson v. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 5:42 am
Logistic Regression: A state-of-the-art supervised learning algorithm for machine learning that estimates the probability that a document is relevant, based on the features that it contai [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 6:59 am
Grossman and Gordon V. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 3:53 am
United States, in which the justices ruled that a state-law robbery conviction can qualify as a “violent felony” for the purposes of a sentencing enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act even when the conviction does not require the use of violent force, for this blog. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 5:22 am
Alan Rozenshtein flagged a forthcoming article he wrote for the Yale Law Journal Forum arguing that the Supreme Court was wrong to conclude that the government needed a warrant to collect large quantities of cell-phone location data in United States v. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
More troubling still is the possibility of lulling the public into thinking the United States can adequately address climate change without federal action. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 12:35 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
Robinson, assistant professor at the School of Journalism and Mass Communications at the University of South Carolina:In the years following the landmark United States Supreme Court decision on libel law in New York Times v. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
United Sta [read post]
